Tyler Zink vs Jack Satterfield Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Upon analysis of their recent six-month form, Satterfield and Zink showcase notable differences in second serve and return game statistics. Satterfield has secured 42.25% of points on their second serve, slightly trailing behind Zink who has managed 44.6%. When examining return game performance for second serve points, Satterfield demonstrates a slight edge with 44.09% compared to Zink's 42.84%. In first serve return situations, Satterfield outperforms with 29.46%, whereas Zink registers at 25.75%. These metrics provide a foundational perspective when forecasting match outcomes.

The analysis of breakpoints reveals key insights for gauging player resilience under pressure. Satterfield has saved 39.13% of breakpoints faced, whereas Zink has a significant advantage, having saved 52.72%. This statistic is instrumental in formulating in-game betting predictions. Furthermore, both players exhibit distinct break point conversion rates, with Satterfield converting 33.33% of opportunities, surpassing Zink's 27.73%. Such conversion rates offer an insightful marker for live betting decisions when break points arise during the match.

Performance metrics from the past year further illuminate the competitive landscape. Satterfield has maintained a win rate of 40%, with a 2-3 win/loss record, whereas Zink boasts a 67.16% success rate with a substantial 45-22 record. Career surface preferences also illustrate distinct patterns; Satterfield's best surface, clay, sees them with a 40% win rate, while Zink achieves their highest success on indoor hard courts with 62%. Their clay performance is comparable, noting Zink's slight edge over Satterfield.

From a level assessment perspective, player engagement in tournament types is crucial. Satterfield has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, achieving a 50% win rate, while Zink, competing in similar tournaments, has achieved a 75.56% success rate. Moreover, the average rank of opponents offers context; Satterfield's opponents averaged a rank of 265.4, while Zink competed against those averaging a rank of 406.67. This difference impacts the evaluation of their performance in respective matches.

Deciding set performance is another crucial aspect—Satterfield has triumphed in 100% of their deciding sets, exemplifying steadfastness. Conversely, Zink has won 77% of deciding sets, still reflecting competitive grit. Considering these comprehensive analyses, Zink emerges as the favorite for the upcoming match based on their superior win rates, level of competition, and breakpoint resilience.